|
13
February 2001 Testimony
of Virginia
B. Foote
President
U.S.- Vietnam Trade Council For
the United
States Commission On
International Religious Freedom Chairman
Abrams, members of the Commission, I am pleased to be here today representing
the U.S.-Vietnam Trade Council to testify before your Commission at this
important time in U.S.- Vietnam relations.
The
U.S.- Vietnam Trade Council, founded in 1989, is a trade association with
strong membership from the American business community.
With offices in Washington D.C. and Hanoi we have worked along with our
educational affiliate, the U.S.-Vietnam Forum, to help improve relations
between the United States and Vietnam with educational exchange programs,
annual conferences, Congressional delegations and programs designed to provide
assistance on international trade norms and standards.
Today I would like to discuss the potential of the U.S.-Vietnam Trade
Agreement, signed on July 13, 2000 and the positive impact of normalization of
relations has had on cooperation between the United States and Vietnam in a
number of areas. Beginning in the
late 1980’s, the Vietnamese government committed to ending its isolation and
began working to normalize relations worldwide.
Diplomatically, in this area, Vietnam has had tremendous success in
establishing relations in Europe, within Asia and with the United States. Vietnam joined ASEAN in 1995, APEC in 1998, and now belongs
to over a dozen international organizations and signed onto numerous
international agreements. Vietnam now has observer status in the WTO and is
committed to joining. The
Reagan, Bush and Clinton administrations responded with a policy of
normalizing relations with Vietnam through a step-by-step process pegged to
cooperation on the U.S.’s principal goal of seeking the fullest possible
accounting for our missing in action from the Vietnam War, and affected by
immigration, trade and other issues of importance to the United States.
As the attached timeline shows, this process has proceeded slowly
through three administrations and has led to the lifting of the trade embargo,
the establishment of diplomatic relations and the beginnings of economic
normalization including the initial waiving of the Jackson-Vanik amendment in
1998. Throughout the process of normalization, Vietnam has greatly enhanced
its efforts on issues of high priority to the U.S. including the MIA efforts,
immigration goals, and economic integration.
Vietnam and the U.S. have also developed an important dialogue on human rights
and labor standards. During
President Clinton’s historic visit in November 2000, the U.S. and Vietnam
signed a Memorandum of Understanding to establish a program of cooperation and
dialogue on labor issues. The
U.S. has also pledged $3 million dollars in technical assistance for Vietnam
for bilateral projects and in collaboration with the International Labor
Organization (ILO). The
conclusion of the U.S.-Vietnam Trade Agreement was a key step to further
progress in normalizing relations. The
U.S.-Vietnam Trade Agreement is the most comprehensive agreement Vietnam has
ever signed, and the most comprehensive bilateral trade agreement the U.S. has
ever negotiated. The Vietnamese
government has committed to important reform in the areas of trading rights,
transparency, customs, investment, services, and intellectual property rights.
Although bilateral trade is currently a modest $1 billion (2000
figures), Vietnam is the second most populous nation in Southeast Asia with a
population of 80 million and with extensive economic growth potential.
Moreover, approval of the trade agreement will ensure that exports from
U.S. companies will receive treatment in Vietnam no less favorable than
products of foreign competitors. The
terms of the agreement will require a substantive reform of Vietnam’s legal
infrastructure and will promote the rule of law in Vietnam affecting both
foreign and domestic business.
The agreement, if approved by Congress, would grant
NTR status to Vietnam subject to an annual review under the Jackson-Vanik
Amendment. Presently, Vietnam is
one of only five countries that do not have NTR with the U.S., including
Afghanistan, Cuba, Laos, and North Korea.
But Congressional passage of the U.S.-Vietnam Bilateral Trade Agreement
is not a Vietnamese equivalent to last year’s Congressional passage of PNTR
for China – it is equivalent to granting of annual MFN status to China in
1979 with the normalization of diplomatic relations.
The annual renewal of the U.S.-Vietnam BTA under the Jackson-Vanik
Waiver will provide opportunity for Congress to assess NTR status and the
relationship overall. But the
last ten years of normalization have shown that as the U.S. and Vietnam foster
closer ties it strengthen the overall bilateral relationship and encourages
further dialogue and cooperation on other issues as well. The BTA will not only strengthen market access for American companies in Vietnam, it also will greatly benefit the people of Vietnam. With a per-capita GDP of $387, Vietnam is one of the poorest nations in the world. By increasing trade, investment, and development in Vietnam, and promoting market reforms including greatly expanded trading rights, the BTA could contribute to lifting of Vietnam out of endemic poverty. With a well-educated population with a literacy rate of 91% and with over half under the age of 25, Vietnam has great potential for development as a significant trading partner worldwide. Furthermore, by expanding trade and extending the rule of law in Vietnam, the BTA will encourage access to information and greater transparency. American involvement in the process of economic reform is welcome in Vietnam and could be extremely important to overall development in the long run. American companies set a high standard for trade, investment, labor and business practices. American management and technology is greatly admired in Vietnam. American companies are actively involved in training programs through the Trade Council and individually. American products are popular. Our business community – with great involvement by the Vietnamese- American community – continues to play a key role in the normalization of relations. But given that the U.S. normalized relations far more slowly than other nations did, American business involvement in Vietnam has lagged behind other nations and still operates with severe handicaps. Without NTR status, a trade agreement, and initially without trade support programs, American companies and individuals nonetheless began traveling, investing and trading with Vietnam. Today the U.S. is twelfth largest investor with slightly under one billion committed to foreign investment projects, and $1 billon in two-way trade. Since
the initial “road map” for normalization was laid out under the Bush
Administration in April 1991, the bilateral relationship has made an immense
amount of progress. The
road map pegged normalization of relations to full cooperation from Vietnam in
accounting for U.S. personnel listed as prisoners of war/missing in action
(POW/MIAs), a comprehensive settlement in Cambodia, and immigration issues.
On February 3, 1994 President Clinton lifted the trade embargo on
Vietnam, and in 1995 the U.S. and Vietnam settled bilateral property claims
and opened diplomatic liaison offices in Washington and Hanoi.
In 1997 the Senate approved former Vietnam War POW and Member of
Congress Pete Peterson as U.S. Ambassador to Vietnam.
In 1998 President Clinton issued the first waiver of the Jackson-Vanik
Amendment, which Congress upheld by a vote of 260 in favor and 163 opposed.
Congress renewed the waiver in 1999 by a vote of 297 in favor and 130
opposed. In 2000 the margin
increased positively again to 332 in favor and only 91 opposed. The initial Jackson-Vanik waiver in 1998 allowed trade support programs,
such as loans from the Overseas Private Investment Corp (OPIC), the
Export-Import Bank (Exim) and other credits for American business to establish
operations in Vietnam. Since
reopening in Vietnam, OPIC has committed $15 million in finance support to
three projects and has registrations for 29 projects seeking political risk
insurance. OPIC also supports
four privately managed private equity funds that are eligible to invest up to
$640 million in projects in Vietnam. In
December 1999 Exim and the State Bank of Vietnam completed the framework
agreements, which allowed Exim to begin operations in Vietnam. Initially
U.S. policy pegged the Jackson-Vanik waiver to progress on the Resettlement
Opportunity for Vietnamese Returnees (ROVR) program specifically and
immigration in general. While extremely difficult to reach agreement on initially,
the implementation of the ROVR program has been fairly smooth and rapid.
The State Department reports that the government of Vietnam has cleared
over 96% of the nearly 20,000 ROVR cases.
The Orderly Departure immigration program overall has also been
successful. Approximately half a
million Vietnamese have come to the United States under ODP.
Only a small number of ODP cases remain to be processed.
Since the initial waiver of Jackson-Vanik, the Vietnamese have allowed
all remaining ODP cases – including the Montagnard cases which are of
particular concern to the U.S. – to be processed under the new and far
quicker system developed by the Vietnamese initially just for ROVR cases.
The
ODP office in Bangkok has been closed and responsibility for handling the few
remaining cases successfully transferred to the Refugee Resettlement Section (RRS)
at the Consulate General of Ho Chi Minh City, which opened in August 1999.
It is expected that interviews of remaining ODP and ROVR applicants, of
which a few hundred remained as of June 2000, will be concluded in the near
future. In
the search for our POW/MIAs from the war Vietnam has developed a permanent
staff to visit crash sites and interview witnesses throughout the country.
The U.S. and Vietnam have provided reciprocal access to information on
MIAs from the war and have conducted 41 Joint Field Activities on POW/MIA
cases since 1993. Vietnam has
unilaterally undertaken case specific investigations in 216 cases since 1996. Of 196 persons associated with "last known alive"
cases in Vietnam, fate has been determined for all but 41. President Clinton has certified Vietnamese cooperation since
the law required, most recently issuing a determination on February 3, 2000
that Vietnam "is fully cooperating in good faith with the United
States." Our relationship has strengthened in other areas as well. Americans are traveling to Vietnam in great numbers. In 1997 Vietnam issued 98,000 visas for Americans wishing to travel to Vietnam, over 66,000 for Vietnamese Americans wanting to visit their homeland. In 2000 the total was 152,928 visas, approximately 137,000 of which were for Vietnamese Americans. Remittances from overseas Vietnamese are estimated at $2-3 billion annually and this year one hundred and fifty thousand overseas Vietnamese worldwide returned to Vietnam for the Lunar New Year, a record number. In
November 2000 President Clinton became the first U.S. President to visit
Vietnam since the end of the war. During the President’s trip ten new business partnerships
were announced and our two countries concluded numerous agreements.
One of these was an Agreement on Scientific and Technological
Cooperation to facilitate cooperation between American and Vietnamese
scientists in areas such as health, technological innovation and
entrepreneurship, disaster mitigation and marine and water resource
management. Increased cooperation
in the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases, including typhoid
fever and HIV/AIDS will strengthen Vietnam's ability to meet critical health
challenges. The U.S. and Vietnam also signed a Memorandum of Understanding on Labor
in November 2000. The MOU including $3 million in technical assistance focuses
on strengthening Labor Protection skills training and employment services
social insurance and safety nets employment of the disabled industrial
relations and labor law child labor, focusing on street children and child
trafficking, and workplace education and prevention programs on HIV/AIDS.
Vietnam also ratified the International Labor Convention on the
Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child Labor, thus joining the United States
and 45 other countries that have so demonstrated their commitment to ending
the worst forms of child labor. The U.S also pledged six million in technical assistance to Vietnam over
a three-year period to assist with implementation of the bilateral trade
agreement. Through a grant from
the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the support of our
members, the U.S.-Vietnam Forum has provided technical assistance on
commercial and legal reform to Vietnamese Ministries and government branches
with economic portfolios. The
Forum provided technical assistance on the issues raised by the BTA and WTO
standards. Recently this work has
included assistance with the new Insurance law, which passed the National
Assembly in December 2000, drafting the implementing regulations for the new
Insurance law, and the new Customs law, to be submitted to the National
Assembly in May. We are also
working with the Ministry of Justice and Ministry of Trade on a “roadmap”
of Vietnam’s commitments in the trade agreement, and will continue to assist
in overall BTA implementation.
Since our two countries set out on the path to normalized relations
Vietnam has enjoyed many successes and few setbacks.
The bold economic reform program that Vietnam embarked on in the late
eighties showed impressive results almost immediately.
Vietnam went from near famine to become the third largest rice exporter
behind Thailand and the United States in a matter of a few years.
Economic growth rates climbed to 8 and 9 percent.
Foreign investors flocked to Vietnam.
From 1988 – 1999 over $36.6 billion in foreign investment was
committed. With Vietnam’s very
low per capita income of approximately $250 per year in the early 1990s, the
international donor community began generous overseas development assistance
programs, reaching pledges of $2.8 billion for 1999.
Total ODA committed since 1993, when Vietnam became eligible, to the
end of 2000 equaled $17.5 billion.
By 1996, Vietnam’s impressive FDI growth had peaked at $8.6 billion. But
as the Asian flu hit, and Vietnam’s economic reform stalled, foreign
investment dropped by 40% in 1997 to $4.6 billion and continued to decline.
In 1998, FDI commitments totaled approximately $3.8 billion and in 1999
dropped to $1.5 billion. Official
GDP growth rates were calculated at around 5% in 1998 and 4.7% in 1999, a
ten-year low. In 2000 GDP growth
climbed back to 6.5%, but is expected to drop off again in 2001 due to low
levels of FDI. Unemployment has
hovered around 7.4 percent since 1999, when it climbed up from a low of 5.9
percent in 1996. At the same
time, the poverty rate has fallen by half in the past ten years, one of the
sharpest declines for any country. Income
per person is now around $370 per year and much higher in the major cities.
About 70% of Vietnam’s population of approximately 80 million, live
and work in rural areas, 96% working in the private sector.
In the industrial sector, some 25% of the work force is in the state
sector, 60% in the private sector and 10% in the foreign invested sector.
But currently the private sector accounts for only half of GDP, a
disappointing constant percentage over the last five years – 34% from
farm-based and service sectors, 10% from the foreign invested sector, and only
7% from small to mid-size enterprises. With
50% of the population under 25, and as state enterprises are equitized new
jobs will need to be created in the private sector. For Vietnam, the easy parts of economic reform have been accomplished. But the signing of the U.S.-Vietnam trade agreement was a watershed event. The BTA provides an important blueprint for Vietnam to tackle some of the more difficult issues, which lie ahead. Towards this end, commercial law reform is already underway. In the banking and insurance sector Vietnam passed a new Insurance Law in December 2000 and is currently working on the implementing regulations. The General Department of Customs is working on a new customs law, which has been favorably reviewed by international customs experts. Vietnam is also addressing competition policy, the elimination of burdensome registration and licensing procedures, intellectual property protection, administrative procedures, and increased transparency. A new database of Vietnamese law is now available on the internet and Ho Chi Minh City, has said it will start offering online licensing for foreign investment projects that do not require appraisal. Also
marking a turning point marking important reform in the domestic private
sector is the Enterprise Law, which came into effect in January 2000.
Six months later 5,000 new enterprises had been founded in Vietnam with
a total registered capital of US$285.7 million. These figures are very
significant given the small size of Vietnam’s fledging private sector.
The number of enterprises founded in the six months after the law went
into effect in January 2000 equals the number founded in the previous nine
years. This figure does not
include the 2,647 enterprises in Ho Chi Minh City alone who have switched to
new business fields or expanded their operations, investing a combined $67.7
million. Also significant was the
opening of the long-awaited stock market in July 2000. The
United States should stay involved in this process.
It is in our interest to see an economically healthy and
internationally engaged Vietnam in the Southeast Asian region.
The Economist Intelligence Unit estimates that although GDP growth
increased in 2000 to 6.5%, it will slow in 2001 due to the continuing decrease
in foreign investment. However,
the EIU estimates that passage of the bilateral trade agreement with the U.S.
this year would boost Vietnam’s GDP growth again in 2002 to 6.8%.
With fully normalized economic relations, the United States could well
join the top ranks of investors in Vietnam.
Vietnam has made substantive progress in political and social reforms
since the launching of doi moi in 1986. Since
then we have seen improvements
in human rights, with the release of hundreds of political detainees and
re-education camp inmates, the return of thousands of Vietnamese who had fled
abroad as refugees, and increased willingness on the part of the government to
cooperate with the U.N. on human rights issues.
Vietnam signed the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights (ICCPR) in 1982, and has recently begun to work with the U.N. to
address the rights protected in the Covenant.
In 2000 Vietnam has released over 20 religious or political prisoners
from jail, including 12 Hmong Protestants and three Catholic priests. Some
dissidents released from prisons still face harassment, but they have been
able to meet outsiders and supporters.
Although problems remain, religious freedom in Vietnam has generally
improved over the past ten years and the individual practice of religion has
increased dramatically. In the
past three years the Government has loosened restrictions on Roman Catholics,
relaxing the requirement that clergy belong to the government-run Catholic
Patriotic Association. Authorities
allowed the Vatican's ordination of a new archbishop in Ho Chi Minh City in
1998 as well as the ordination of five bishops in other dioceses in 1998 and
1999. A high-level Vatican envoy
made his annual visit to the country in May 2000, during which the filling of
other vacant bishoprics was discussed. In
June 2000, a bishop was named for Da Nang province, and in August 2000, a
bishop was named for Vinh Long province.
In 1998 a number of bishops traveled to Rome, Italy, for a synod of
Asian bishops. Up to 200,000 Catholics gathered in August 1999 at an annual
Marian celebration in La Vang in the central part of the country and
celebrated their faith freely there. This
month the government recognized the Federation of the Evangelical Church of
Vietnam, which just concluded its first official gathering in Ho Chi Minh
City. The government of Vietnam
now officially recognizes six religions, including the Federation of the
Evangelical Church of Vietnam. Social
and political reform has been reflected in the formation and changing
composition of the National Assembly. The position of Vietnam's National
Assembly as the highest organ of the State is fixed in the 1992 Constitution
and is elected directly by the people through secret ballot. The
National Assembly approves the state budget, and has the final say on large
scale or long-term economic projects. In
practice, the National Assembly is increasingly assertive in Vietnam's
political structure, taking a more active role on reviewing legal reforms.
Women make up over 25 percent of the National Assembly, and in the
present Assembly 14 percent of the representatives are non-Party members.
The Chairman of the National Assembly Nguyen Duc Manh is a member of
the Tay ethnic minority group and is serving is second term as Chairman of the
National Assembly. Vietnam’s
strategic and economic role in the region and the well being of the Vietnamese
people will be greatly affected by U.S.- Vietnam relations and by the course
of bilateral relations. The
bi-partisan policy of a step-by-step process of normalizing relations with
Vietnam, while in my view has been too slow, has produced positive results for
American, Vietnamese and regional interests and I encourage a continuation of
this policy in the future. Vietnam and the U.S. share a tragic history, which
both countries are mindful of as they build a new future.
Comfort with the outside world’s intentions and a growing economy
will continue to contribute to increased openness, increased transparency in
government, a rise in living standards, and greater international economic and
political integration. The past
ten years is proof. Religious Demography of Vietnam The Government officially recognizes Buddhist
(approximately 50 percent), Roman Catholic (8 percent), Protestant (0.9
percent), Cao Dai (1 percent), Hoa Hao (2 percent), and Muslim (0.1 percent)
religious organizations. However, some Buddhist, Protestant, Cao Dai, and Hoa
Hao believers do not recognize or participate in the government-approved
associations. Some organize their own associations, and thus their
organizations are considered illegal by the authorities.
Buddhism Catholicism Authorities allowed the Vatican's ordination of a new
archbishop in Ho Chi Minh City in 1998 as well as the ordination of five
bishops in other dioceses in 1998 and 1999. A high-level Vatican envoy made
his annual visit to the country in May 2000, during which the filling of other
vacant bishoprics was discussed. In June 2000, a bishop was named for Da Nang
province, and in August 2000, a bishop was named for Vinh Long province. In
1998 a number of bishops traveled to Rome, Italy, for a synod of Asian
bishops. Up to 200,000 Catholics gathered in August 1999 at an annual Marian
celebration in La Vang in the central part of the country and celebrated their
faith freely there. Protestantism Based on believers' estimates, two-thirds of
Protestants are members of ethnic minorities, including ethnic Hmong (some
120,000 followers) in the northwest provinces and some 200,000 members of
ethnic minority groups of the central highlands (Ede, Jarai, Bahnar, and Koho,
among others). The house churches in ethnic minority areas have been growing
rapidly in recent years, sparked in part by radio broadcasts in ethnic
minority languages from the Philippines. Cao Dai Hoa Hao Islam The Muslim Association of Vietnam was banned in 1975
but authorized again in 1992. It is the only official Muslim organization.
Association leaders say that they are able to practice their faith, including
daily prayer, fasting during the month of Ramadan, and the pilgrimage to
Mecca, Saudi Arabia. The Government no longer restricts Muslims from making
the Hajj. Roughly 1 dozen Muslims journey to Mecca for the Hajj each year. Hinduism Baha’i Mormonism The prominent position of Buddhism does not affect
adversely religious freedom for others, including those who wish not to
practice a religion. The secular Government does not favor a particular
religion. The Constitution expressly protects the right of "nonbelief"
as well as "belief." Of the country's approximately 80 million
citizens, 14 million or more reportedly do not practice any organized
religion. Some sources strictly define those considered to be practicing
Buddhists, excluding those whose activities are limited to visiting pagodas on
ceremonial holidays. Using this definition, the number of nonreligious persons
would be much higher, perhaps as high as 50 million persons. February 13, 2001 Source: State Department Human Rights Report 2000 (http://www.state.gov/www/global/human_rights/irf/irf_rpt/irf_vietnam.html)
731 Eighth St. SE Washington, DC
20003; usvtc@erols.com
P: 202-547-3800 F:
202-546-4784; old.usvtc.org Chronology of U.S.-Vietnam Relations
April
30, 1975
North Vietnamese forces take over the southern part of Vietnam, ended the
war and unified the country. Washington extends an embargo to all of Vietnam and
breaks diplomatic relations. 1978
Secret talks between Hanoi and Washington on normalizing relations break
down. 1988
Under the Reagan Administration, Vietnam begins cooperation with United
States to resolve fate of American servicemen missing in action (MIA) September
1989
Vietnam completes its withdrawal from Cambodia. April
1991
Under the Bush Administration, Washington presents Hanoi with
“roadmap” plan for phased normalization of ties. The two sides agree to open
a U.S. government office in Hanoi to help settle MIA issues. April
1991
U.S. begins humanitarian aid projects for war victims to be administered
by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
October 1991 Vietnam supports U.N. peace plan for Cambodia. Secretary of State James Baker announces Washington is ready to take steps toward normalizing relations with Hanoi. December
1991
Washington lifts the ban on organized U.S. travel to Vietnam. 1991
U.S. Congress authorizes the United States Information Agency (USIA) to
begin exchange programs with Vietnam. April
1992
Washington eases trade embargo by allowing commercial sales to Vietnam
for basic human needs, lifts curbs on projects by U.S. non-governmental and
non-profit groups and allows establishment of telecommunications links with
Vietnam. July
2, 1993
President Clinton clears way for resumption of international lending to
Vietnam. September
13, 1993
Clinton eases economic sanctions to let U.S firms join in development
projects. January
27, 1994
Senate in favor of a resolution urging the Administration to lift
embargo, saying this would help get a full account of MIAs. February
3, 1994
President Clinton lifts trade embargo. January 28, 1995 United States and Vietnam sign agreements settling old property claims and establishing liaison offices in each other's capitals. May 15, 1995 Vietnam gives U.S. presidential delegation batch of documents on missing Americans, later hailed by Pentagon as most detailed and informative of their kind. June 1995 Veterans of Foreign Wars announces support of U.S. normalization of diplomatic relations with Vietnam. July 11, 1995 President Clinton announces ``normalization of relations'' with Vietnam. August 6, 1995 Secretary of State Warren Christopher visits Hanoi and officially opens U.S. embassy. May
1996
U.S. presents Vietnam with trade agreement blueprint.
July 12, 1996 U.S. National Security Adviser Anthony Lake visits Hanoi to mark first anniversary of normalization and press forward on slow-moving economic and strategic ties, stressing that MIA issue tops Washington's agenda. April 7, 1997 U.S. Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin and Finance Minister Nguyen Sinh Hung sign accord in Hanoi for Vietnam to repay debts of approximately $145 million, which Vietnam assumed from former government of South Vietnam. April 10, 1997 Senate confirms Douglas “Pete” Peterson, Vietnam War veteran and former prisoner of war, as Ambassador. April 16, 1997 United States and Vietnam reach agreement on providing legal protection for copyright owners. May 9, 1997
Peterson takes up post as U.S. Ambassador in Hanoi. May
9, 1997
Vietnam's Ambassador to the United States, Le Van Bang, arrives to take
up post in Washington, DC. June
1997
Secretary of State Madeleine Albright attends ceremony to lay cornerstone
for U.S. consulate in Ho Chi Minh City. August 1997 U.S. government under the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) begins a commercial law program. October
1997
Vietnam institutes new processing procedure in ROVR program significantly
improving progress. November 1997
Vietnam opens consulate in San Francisco, CA. March 1998
U.S. opens talks on a Civil Aviation Agreement. March 11, 1998 President Clinton issues waiver of Jackson-Vanik Amendment for Vietnam, paving the way for OPIC, Exim, USDA and MARAD operations. March 19, 1998 OPIC and the Government of Vietnam signed a new Investment Incentive Agreement, allowing OPIC to offers services in Vietnam. March 26, 1998 Minister of Planning & Investment Tran Xuan Gia and Ambassador Pete Peterson finalize signing of the OPIC bilateral for Vietnam. April
7, 1998
Jackson-Vanik waiver for Vietnam is issued Executive Order 13079. July
23,1998
The U.S. Senate votes 66-34 to continue funding for the U.S. Embassy in
Vietnam based on ongoing cooperation on the POW/MIA issue. July
30, 1998
The U.S. House of Representatives passes the Jackson-Vanik waiver for
Vietnam by a 260 to 163-vote margin.
October
1998
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Nguyen Manh Cam make
Vietnam’s highest -level visit to Washington since normalization. October
1998
Deputy Prime Minister Hanh visits U.S. for planning meeting on
military-to-military activities. October 1998
U.S. and Vietnam agree to negotiate Science & Technology Agreement. December 28, 1998
Bilateral
Copyright Agreement enters into force. January 1999
Exim team visits Vietnam to negotiate an Exim bilateral agreement.
January 29, 1999 The U.S. receives a proposal from the Vietnamese indicating substantial progress on the U.S.-Vietnam bilateral trade negotiations. March 1999
The most recent round of trade talks are held in Hanoi. June
1999
High level trade talks held in Washington, DC.
June
30, 1999
President Clinton re-extends the Jackson-Vanik waiver for Vietnam July
25, 1999
Negotiators Ambassador Richard Fisher and Trade Minister Tuyen agree to a
bilateral trade agreement in principle in Hanoi, Vietnam August
3, 1999
The Jackson –Vanik waiver passes the House by a vote of 297 to 130. August
16, 1999
The U.S. opens a consulate in Ho Chi Minh City September
1999
President Clinton and Prime Minister Phan Van Khai speak informally at
the APEC summit in New Zealand. September
5, 1999
Secretary Albright visits Vietnam November
30, 1999 The
first OPIC investment in Vietnam is announced- a $2.3 million loan to
Caterpillar Inc.’s authorized dealership in Vietnam. December
9, 1999
Ex-Im and the State Bank of Vietnam complete the framework agreements,
which allow Ex-Im to begin operations in Vietnam. March
13, 2000
Secretary of Defense William Cohen became the first U.S. Defense
Secretary to visit Vietnam since the end of the War. March
14, 2000
Vietnam sends letter to the U.S. requesting clarification of issues in
the Bi-lateral Trade Agreement. May
17, 2000
USTR Ambassador Charlene Barshefsky responds to Vietnamese letter of the
bilateral trade agreement and invites Vietnam’s Trade Minister Vu Khoan to
Washington. July
5, 2000
Vietnam’s Minister of Trade Vu Khoan arrives in Washington, DC to
continue talks on the trade agreement with Ambassador Barshefsky. July
13, 2000
Minister Khoan and Ambassador Barshefsky sign an agreement on trade
relations at USTR. July
13, 2000
President Clinton announces the conclusion of a bilateral trade agreement
from the White House Rose Garden. July
26, 2000
Congress voted 332-91 to renew the Jackson-Vanik Amendment for Vietnam
for the year 2000. September
14, 2000 The
White House announced that President Clinton will visit Vietnam from the 16th
to the 20th of November. The President will travel to Vietnam
after attending annual APEC meetings in Brunei. November
16-20, 2000 November 16-20,
2000 President Clinton visits
Vietnam, with Commerce Secretary Norman Mineta, USTR Ambassador Charlene
Barshefsky, Senator John Kerry, Congressmen Earl Blumenauer, Loretta Sanchez,
Vic Snyder, and Mike Thompson. Also
business delegations and the leadership of the Veterans of Foreign Wars
attended. November
17, 2000 The
U.S. Department of Labor and Vietnam’s Ministry of Labor, Invalids, and Social
Affairs sign a Memorandum of Understanding on Labor cooperation. November
18, 2000 President
Clinton travels to Ho Chi Minh City. November
20, 2000 President
Clinton departs Vietnam. January
15-18, 2001 House
Minority leader Congressman Dick Gephardt (D-MO) and Congressman Ray LaHood
(R-IL) lead a Congressional delegation to Vietnam.
731
Eighth St. SE Washington, DC 20003
Phone: 202-547-3800 H Fax: 202-546-4784 U.S.-VIETNAM NTR STATUS AND THE BILATERAL TRADE
AGREEMENT
The U.S. and Vietnam
signed an Agreement on Trade Relations July 13, 2000 in Washington, D.C, paving
the way for the reciprocal extension of Normal Trade Relations, or NTR. H What is Vietnam’s current status? While
Vietnam has granted the U.S. NTR tariffs on a waiver basis, the U.S. has not
granted Vietnam NTR status since the end of the war. Vietnam is one of six
countries that do not have NTR status, including Afghanistan, Cuba, Laos, North
Korea, Serbia & Montenegro. Now
that the trade agreement has been signed, a Presidential request for NTR can be
submitted to Congress for approval. The
annual Jackson-Vanik vote, normally in July, in the U.S. Congress for Vietnam
affects only the ongoing operations of Ex-Im Bank, OPIC and other trade support
agencies. H How does Vietnam receive NTR status under U.S. Law? In
order for Vietnam to receive NTR status from the U.S., the following criteria
must first be met under Title IV of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended:
1) A waiver of the Jackson-Vanik Amendment must be in force and renewed
annually by the President; and 2) the U.S. and Vietnam must conclude a bilateral
trade agreement. NTR can only be extended through a joint “approval
resolution” passed by both the House and the Senate.
NTR status for Vietnam would then be subject to annual renewal each
summer through the continuation of the Jackson-Vanik waiver. The trade agreement
itself must be renewed every three years. H What are the Congressional procedures and possible timetable? Pursuant to Section 152
(b) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an approval resolution for NTR status
is first introduced (by request) to the House and the Senate and then is
referred to the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee.
Both the House and the Senate must vote in favor of NTR for it to be
granted. Since Vietnam is a
Jackson-Vanik country, the NTR request has a built-in timetable and procedures
for Congressional consideration. The agreement cannot be amended and the request
must be voted on by the House and the Senate within 60 session days in each
Chamber from when the President’s request is submitted to Congress, with a
maximum of 45 legislative days in committee and 15 days on the floor of each
chamber within which time, up to a total of seventy-five days, a vote must be
taken. Debate on the floor is
limited to 20 hours each for both Houses. Upon
Congressional approval and a Presidential signature, diplomatic notes are
exchanged between the two sides, formally extending reciprocal NTR status.
Therefore the Bush
administration should submit a request for NTR in February 2001, as the 60 - 75
session days allowed would mean a late June or early July vote would be possible
and therefore around the time of the annual Jackson-Vanik renewal. ê
What further steps are there in achieving economic normalization with
Vietnam? Vietnam
and the U.S. will also negotiate a bilateral textile agreement and talks are
underway for a bilateral aviation agreement.
Vietnam will also continue talks with its Working Party for accession
into the World Trade Organization (WTO). Upon conclusion of negotiations with
the U.S. and other trading partners on WTO accession, legislation will be
submitted to the U.S. Congress requesting the granting of Permanent Normal Trade
Relations (PNTR) for Vietnam. Consequently,
Vietnam would be eligible for the consideration of benefits under the U.S.
General System of Preferences (GSP) program and permanent trade relations (PNTR)
status.
|